lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 5/6] parisc: wire up rseq system call
From
Date
On 08.10.2018 07:52, Firoz Khan wrote:
> Hi Helge,
>
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 11:11, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 08.10.2018 07:16, Firoz Khan wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>>> index 4e85293..4334bb7 100644
>>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>>> @@ -349,4 +349,5 @@
>>> 347 common preadv2 sys_preadv2 compat_sys_preadv2
>>> 348 common pwritev2 sys_pwritev2 compat_sys_pwritev2
>>> 349 common statx sys_statx
>>> -350 common io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents compat_sys_io_pgetevents
>>> \ No newline at end of file
>>> +350 common io_pgetevents sys_io_pgetevents compat_sys_io_pgetevents
>>> +351 common rseq sys_rseq compat_sys_rseq
>>
>> You can't add the rseq syscall for parisc yet.
>> It needs additional code in the kernel for parisc which hasn't been tested yet.
>> See my initial untested patch at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10495209/
>
> Thanks for your update!
>
> When I compiled the kernel I got below warnings.
>
> <stdin>:696:2: warning: #warning syscall nfsservctl not implemented [-Wcpp]
> <stdin>:1335:2: warning: #warning syscall rseq not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> I added an IGNORE entry nfsservctl in script/checksyscalls.sh because this
> syscall is gone. But we definitely have to keep rseq entry on parisc
> architecture.

I prefer to keep the warning for rseq for now.
It reminds me that we still may want the rseq syscall.
If the warning is a problem, you may simply add the __IGNORE_rseq define.

> I can ignore this patch currently as your patch not yet tested.
>
> FYI, I have merged the system call table files based on our previous
> discussions.
> Please comment on that.

I'll do after testing.

Thanks!
Helge

> I would appreciate if you can perform a boot test without this patch
> on the actual
> platform.
>
> Firoz
>
>>
>> Helge

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-08 08:06    [W:0.076 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site