Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:32:43 -0300 | From | Mauro Carvalho Chehab <> | Subject | Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses |
| |
Em Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:37:59 +1000 Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 08:56, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:25:35AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > > This isn't a legally binding license or anything, but departing from > > > the upstream wording makes it tricker to merge new upstream versions > > > if they are considered appropriate. > > > > Nicely done, that - gotta love the passive voice use. Considered appropriate > > *by* *whom*? > > Good question, do we have a CoC maintainer? Is Linus it, Greg, TAB? > > Maybe step one is to find the person who can make changes to the > kernel CoC (has anyone checked if Linus or Greg will merge this).
If we add it to the MAINTAINERS file (with makes perfect sense to me), I would like to have a R: entry there, in order to be notified when people propose changes to it. My personal understanding is that it may have legal value under the legislation of the Country I live, and I'd like to understand changes there that might affect my workflow.
Thanks, Mauro
| |