Messages in this thread | | | From | Jani Nikula <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysfs: constify sysfs create/remove files harder | Date | Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:05:48 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:10:24PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:38:53PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:37:49PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> >> Let the passed in array be const (and thus placed in rodata) instead of >> >> >> a mutable array of const pointers. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> >> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> >> >> >> --- >> >> >> fs/sysfs/file.c | 4 ++-- >> >> >> include/linux/sysfs.h | 8 ++++---- >> >> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> > >> >> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> >> >> >> >> Thanks; who should pick them up? >> > >> > I could pick the first one up, but as you need this for a drm patch, >> > both should probably go through that tree, right? >> >> I can pick them both if it doesn't bother you that the sysfs parts will >> be merged in the merge window for v4.21 i.e. the change would be in drm >> trees for an entire release cycle. We've been done for v4.20 merge >> window for a while now. > > No objection from me.
Argh, I dropped the ball a bit. May I take that as an ack to merge via drm-intel? I try to be careful not to assume acks and reviews.
Thanks, Jani.
-- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
| |