lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/10] arch/x86: AMD QoS support
    Date


    On 10/03/2018 01:52 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
    > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:16:23PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> On 10/02/2018 01:46 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
    >>> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:44:47PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
    >>>> Hi Fenghua,
    >>>>
    >>>>> -----Original Message-----
    >>>>> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
    >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 12:07 PM
    >>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 07:18:54PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
    >>>>>> The public specification is still in works. Will add the link when it is
    >>>>>> available.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Is this the public AMD QoS spec?
    >>>>> https://support.amd.com/TechDocs/56375_Quality_of_Service_Extensions.
    >>>>> pdf
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Yes. That is the one.
    >>>> I was going to send the link after refreshing the patches on 4-19-rc5. You already got it. Please let know if you have any feedback on the patches.
    >>>
    >>> I don't see the name 'RDT' (Resource Director Technology) in the
    >>> spec "AMD64 Technology Platform Quality of Service Extensions".
    >>> Does AMD use the same name 'RDT' as Intel?
    >>
    >> No. AMD uses the word "Platform Quality of Service"(or in short QoS) to
    >> refer this feature.
    >
    > Hi, Thomas, Babu, and James,
    >
    > Can we use "resctrl" to replace "intel_rdt" and "rdt" in kernel? "resctrl"
    > is a neutral name and has been used in user interface already. Hopefully
    > "resctrl" can be acceptable by ARM, AMD, and Intel. We only use "intel_rdt",
    > "amd_qos", or "arm mpam" for vendor specific code.

    Yes. resctrl seems like a reasonable name. >
    > Can we move all of Intel RDT, AMD QoS, and ARM MPAM code into a generic
    > place fs/resctrl where both ARM and X86 code can stay?

    Looking at the James patches, I thought he is going in the same(or
    similar) direction eventually.


    >
    > Thanks.
    >
    > -Fenghua
    >
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-10-03 22:10    [W:4.624 / U:1.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site