lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode
From
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:42:56 -0400

>
>
> On 10/29/2018 1:40 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:33:06 -0400
>>
>>> I just realized that the problem in KNL will be back if we switch
>>> back to non-overwrite mode.
>> What is KNL?
>>
> Intel Xeon Phi Processor, Knights Landing.

I don't understand how a specific piece of hardware directly leads to
ring buffer processing timeouts, or multi-minute thread map processing
times...

You'll have to explain all of the details of your test scenerio, and
the exact problems triggers, which caused you to write these patches
which causes serious regressions for what I consider a core simple use
case of perf top.

And that's running perf top during a parallel kernel build.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-29 18:49    [W:0.079 / U:3.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site