[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/core: Don't mix isolcpus and housekeeping CPUs
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:53:17PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >
> > You can create multiple partitions with cpusets but still have an
> > unbound task in the root cgroup. That would suffer the exact same
> > problems.
> >
> I probably don't understand this. Even if the child cgroups has
> cpu_exclusive or sched_load_balance reset, the tasks in root cgroup has
> access to all cpus in system. Right?

The crucial word being 'access'. The root group will not impose a limit
on the affinity of tasks. So you can indeed have affinities that span
load balancing domains.

And yes, that leads to 'interesting' but specified behaviour.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-26 10:50    [W:0.076 / U:22.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site