lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Revert "workqueue: re-add lockdep dependencies for flushing"
From
Date
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I must also say that I'm disappointed you'd try to do things this way.
> I'd be (have been?) willing to actually help you understand the problem
> and add the annotations, but rather than answer my question ("where do I
> find the right git tree"!) you just send a revert patch.

Sorry that I had not yet provided that information. You should have
received this information through another e-mail thread. See also
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-October/020493.html.

> To do that, you have to understand what recursion is valid (I'm guessing
> there's some sort of layering involved), and I'm far from understanding
> anything about the code that triggered this report.

I don't think there is any kind of recursion involved in the NVMe code
that triggered the lockdep complaint. Sagi, please correct me if I got this
wrong.

Bart.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-22 23:48    [W:0.101 / U:4.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site