Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:17:30 +0000 | From | Wei Yang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] memblock: remove stale #else and the code it protects |
| |
Which tree it applies?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:03:45PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: >During removal of HAVE_MEMBLOCK definition, the #else clause of the > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK > ... > #else > ... > #endif > >conditional was not removed. > >Remove it now. > >Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >Reported-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> >Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> >--- > include/linux/memblock.h | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h >index d3bc270..d4d0e01 100644 >--- a/include/linux/memblock.h >+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h >@@ -597,11 +597,6 @@ static inline void early_memtest(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end) > { > } > #endif >-#else >-static inline phys_addr_t memblock_alloc(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align) >-{ >- return 0; >-} > > #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ > >-- >2.7.4
-- Wei Yang Help you, Help me
| |