lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm/thp: Correctly differentiate between mapped THP and PMD migration entry
Date
On 10/12/18 1:32 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 10/09/2018 06:48 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 04:04:21PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 09:28:58AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> A normal mapped THP page at PMD level should be correctly differentiated
>>>> from a PMD migration entry while walking the page table. A mapped THP would
>>>> additionally check positive for pmd_present() along with pmd_trans_huge()
>>>> as compared to a PMD migration entry. This just adds a new conditional test
>>>> differentiating the two while walking the page table.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 616b8371539a6 ("mm: thp: enable thp migration in generic path")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> On X86, pmd_trans_huge() and is_pmd_migration_entry() are always mutually
>>>> exclusive which makes the current conditional block work for both mapped
>>>> and migration entries. This is not same with arm64 where pmd_trans_huge()
>>>> returns positive for both mapped and migration entries. Could some one
>>>> please explain why pmd_trans_huge() has to return false for migration
>>>> entries which just install swap bits and its still a PMD ?
>>>
>>> I guess it's just a design choice. Any reason why arm64 cannot do the
>>> same?
>>
>> Anshuman, would it work to:
>>
>> #define pmd_trans_huge(pmd) (pmd_present(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT))
> yeah this works but some how does not seem like the right thing to do
> but can be the very last option.
>


There can be other code paths that makes that assumption. I ended up
doing the below for pmd_trans_huge on ppc64.

/*
* Only returns true for a THP. False for pmd migration entry.
* We also need to return true when we come across a pte that
* in between a thp split. While splitting THP, we mark the pmd
* invalid (pmdp_invalidate()) before we set it with pte page
* address. A pmd_trans_huge() check against a pmd entry during that time
* should return true.
* We should not call this on a hugetlb entry. We should check for HugeTLB
* entry using vma->vm_flags
* The page table walk rule is explained in Documentation/vm/transhuge.rst
*/
static inline int pmd_trans_huge(pmd_t pmd)
{
if (!pmd_present(pmd))
return false;

if (radix_enabled())
return radix__pmd_trans_huge(pmd);
return hash__pmd_trans_huge(pmd);
}

-aneesh

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-15 10:33    [W:0.068 / U:9.392 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site