lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] hisi_sas: Misc bugfixes and an optimisation patch
From
Date
On 11/10/2018 14:32, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:12:11PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> On 11/10/2018 11:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:59:11AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> blk-mq tags are always per-host (which has actually caused problems for
>>>>> ATA, which is now using its own per-device tags).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, for example, if Scsi_host.can_queue = 2048 and Scsi_host.nr_hw_queues =
>>>> 16, then rq tags are still in range [0, 2048) for that HBA, i.e. invariant
>>>> on queue count?
>>>
>>> Yes, if can_queue is 2048 you will gets tags from 0..2047.
>>>
>>
>> I should be clear about some things before discussing this further. Our
>> device has 16 hw queues. And each command we send to any queue in the device
>> must have a unique tag across all hw queues for that device, and should be
>> in the range [0, 2048) - it's called an IPTT. So Scsi_host.can_queue = 2048.
>
> Could you describe a bit about IPTT?
>

IPTT is an "Initiator Tag". It is a tag to map to the context of a hw
queue command. It is related to SAS protocol Initiator Port tag. I think
that most SAS HBAs have a similar concept.

IPTTs are limited, and must be recycled when an IO completes. Our hw
supports upto 2048. So we have a limit of 2048 commands issued at any
point in time.

Previously we had been managing IPTT in LLDD, but found rq tag can be
used as IPTT (as in 6/7), to gave a good performance boost.

> Looks like the 16 hw queues are like reply queues in other drivers,
> such as megara_sas, but given all the 16 reply queues share one tagset,
> so the hw queue number has to be 1 from blk-mq's view.
>
>>
>> However today we only expose a single queue to upper layer (for unrelated
>> LLDD error handling restriction). We hope to expose all 16 queues in future,
>> which is what I meant by "enabling SCSI MQ in the driver". However, with
>> 6/7, this creates a problem, below.
>
> If the tag of each request from all hw queues has to be unique, you
> can't expose all 16 queues.

Well we can if we generate and manage the IPTT in the LLDD, as we had
been doing. If we want to use the rq tag - which 6/7 is for - then we can't.

>
>>
>>> IFF you device needs different tags for different queues it can use
>>> the blk_mq_unique_tag heper to generate unique global tag.
>>
>> So this helper can't help, as fundamentially the issue is "the tag field in
>> struct request is unique per hardware queue but not all all hw queues".
>> Indeed blk_mq_unique_tag() does give a unique global tag, but cannot be used
>> for the IPTT.
>>
>> OTOH, We could expose 16 queues to upper layer, and drop 6/7, but we found
>> it performs worse.
>
> We discussed this issue before, but not found a good solution yet for
> exposing multiple hw queues to blk-mq.

I just think that it's unfortunate that enabling blk-mq means that the
LLDD loses this unique tag across all queues in range [0,
Scsi_host.can_queue), so much so that we found performance better by not
exposing multiple queues and continuing to use single rq tag...

>
> However, we still get good performance in case of none scheduler by the
> following patches:
>
> 8824f62246be blk-mq: fail the request in case issue failure
> 6ce3dd6eec11 blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case of 'none'
>

I think that these patches would have been included in our testing. I
need to check.

>
> Thanks,
> Ming


Thanks,
John

>
> .
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-11 16:09    [W:0.078 / U:45.636 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site