lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: add LX2160ARDB board support
Date
On 8/29/2018 3:31 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 15:45 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:52 PM Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@nxp.com> wrote:
>>> +/ {
>>> + model = "NXP Layerscape LX2160ARDB";
>>> + compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-rdb", "fsl,lx2160a";
>>> +
>>> + aliases {
>>> + crypto = &crypto;
>>
>> Drop this. Aliases should be numbered, and this is not a standard
>> alias name either.
>
> Is this a new rule? In any case, U-Boot looks for a "crypto" alias.
>
(Replying here, I did not see a follow-up).

Indeed, U-boot relies on the "crypto" alias.
This is true for all SoCs with CAAM crypto engine, a pretty lengthy list.

Could you please clarify?
Also: Is numbering needed even when there is a single instance of the block?

Looking at a recent discussion
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/991718
I see the proposal is for the ID to be optional:
> Alias names are often suffixed with a numeric ID, especially when there may
> be multiple instances of the same type. The ID typically corresponds to the
[...]

Thanks,
Horia

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-11 12:06    [W:0.106 / U:36.124 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site