lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes
    From
    Date
    On 10/10/18 23:07, James Bottomley wrote:
    > Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing
    > the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want. If it
    > gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two.
    >
    > ---
    >
    > Previous cover letter:
    >
    >
    > We've had several threads discussing potential changes to the code of
    > conduct but Mauro is the only person to have proposed an actual patch.
    > In order to move the debate on, I'm presenting two patches, one to fix
    > the email problem Mauro identified and the other to strip the
    > enforcement section pending community discussion as Shuah suggested.
    >
    > I'll take responsibility for collecting any tags people want to add
    > (review/ack/sign off, etc) and sending the patch in as a signed pull
    > request before 4.19 final if they get enough community support.
    >
    > Note, I've sent both patches in as a series to facilitate review and
    > discussion, but they are separable if one is looked on with less favour
    > than the other.
    >
    > It was also a bit unclear which list to send this to, but I finally
    > settled on linux-kernel as the catch all and ksummit-discuss since
    > that's where most of the current discussion is. I can add other lists
    > as people suggest them.
    >
    > James
    >
    > ---
    >
    > James Bottomley (3):
    > code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses
    > code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community
    > discussion
    > code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point
    >
    > Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 13 ++++---------
    > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
    >

    For the three patches (preferably with Alan's "except where required by
    law"):

    Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@iki.fi>

    Although I think reverting 8a104f8b5867c682 is the best option.

    Tomi

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-10-11 08:40    [W:5.518 / U:0.576 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site