lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 00/24] ILP32 for ARM64
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 08:39:57PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> + Pavel Machek, Palmer Dabbelt, Wookey.
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:18:45AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > This series enables AARCH64 with ILP32 mode.
> >
> > As supporting work, it introduces ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T configuration
> > option that is enabled for existing 32-bit architectures but disabled
> > for new arches (so 64-bit off_t userspace type is used by new userspace).
> > Also it deprecates getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls prior to prlimit64.
> >
> > Based on kernel v4.16. Tested with LTP, glibc testsuite, trinity, lmbench,
> > CPUSpec.

> This is the update of the series based on 4.17 kernel
> https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/ilp32-4.17

Hello.

I have some questions regarding AArch64 ILP32 implementation for which I
failed to find an answer myself:
* How ptrace() tracer is supposed to distinguish between ILP32 and LP64
tracees? For MIPS N32 and x32 this is possible based on syscall
number, but for AArch64 ILP32 I do not see such a sign. There's also
ARM_ip is employed for signalling entering/exiting, I wonder whether
it's possible to employ it also for signalling tracee's personality.
* What's the reasoning behind capping syscall arguments to 32 bit? x32
and MIPS N32 do not have such a restriction (and do not need special
wrappers for syscalls that pass 64-bit values as a result, except
when they do, as it is the case for preadv2 on x32); moreover, that
would lead to insurmountable difficulties for AArch64 ILP32 tracers
that try to trace LP64 tracees, as it would be impossible to pass
64-bit addresses to process_vm_{read,write} or ptrace PEEK/POKE.

Thank you.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-10-10 16:10    [W:0.612 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site