lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: unify the interface of the proportional-share policy in blkio/io
From
Date
On 1/9/18 12:52 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:00:02PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> The solution for the second type of parameters may prove useful to
>> unify also the computation of statistics for the throttling policy.
>>
>> Does this proposal sound reasonable?
>
> So, the above should work too but I wonder whether we could do this
> simpler. Frankly, I wouldn't mind if cfq and bfq can't be mixed on a
> system - e.g. they can be built together but you can't enable bfq on
> some devides and cfq on others. If we do that, all we need to do is
> just removing / adding cftypes when either gets activated which cgroup
> already does.

Not sure that would fly, since cfq is legacy and bfq is mq. You don't
always have a free choice of which one to use...

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:20    [W:1.980 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site