lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/spec_ctrl: Add sysctl knobs to enable/disable SPEC_CTRL feature
From
Date
On 01/09/2018 02:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:28:12AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
>>> On 01/08/2018 08:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 01:47:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>>>> a good suggestion, but we encountered some issues with it either
>>>>>> crashing the kernel at boot or not properly turning on/off.
>>>>
>>>> The below boots, but I lack stuff to test the enabling.
>>>
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>> Thanks. Will give it a spin. One other concern is if
>>> JUMP_LABEL is not configured, this may not work, and
>>> we may still need fall back to a control variable.
>>
>> Urgh yes.. I always forget about that case. Will the retpoline crud be
>> backported to a GCC old enough to not have asm-goto? If not, we could
>> make all of this simply require asm-goto.
>
> No, ifs and buts, really.
>
> This wants to be a jump label and we set the requirements here. I'm tired
> of this completely bogus crap just to support some archaic version of GCC.
>
> This is messy enough and no, this whole we need a control variable nonsense
> is just not going to happen.
>
>

Thomas,

I'll be sending an updated patchset with boot option opt in for ibrs
and leave the control varaible out. I agree that we can worry about the
control variable later.

Thanks.

Tim

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-14 23:19    [W:0.187 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site