[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 01/13] x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 15:50 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > +
> > +.macro RETPOLINE_CALL reg:req
> > +       jmp     1113f
> > +1110:  RETPOLINE_JMP \reg
> > +1113:  call    1110b
> > +.endm

(Note that RETPOLINE_CALL is purely internal to nospec-branch.h, used
only from the NOSPEC_CALL macro to make the ALTERNATIVE_2 invocation
s ugly than it would have been. But the same applies to NOSPEC_CALL
which is the one that gets used in our .S files including retpoline.S)

> Why do these still force a register name?
> Is it because this is the only user?

By "register name" are you asking why it's invoked as
"NOSPEC_CALL rbx" instead of "NOSPEC_CALL %rbx" with the percent sign?

I think I can probably clean that up now, and turn a lot of %\reg
occurrences into just \reg. The only remaining %\reg would be left in
retpoline.S inside the THUNK macro used from .irp.

[unhandled content-type:application/x-pkcs7-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-06 11:58    [W:0.069 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site