Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 6 Jan 2018 10:12:33 +0100 | From | Boris Brezillon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: nand: vf610: fix error handling in vf610_nfc_probe() |
| |
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 22:18:26 +0300 Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> wrote:
> vf610_nfc_probe() misses error handling of mtd_device_register(). > > Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org). > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> > --- > v2: Add nand_cleanup() to undone nand_scan_tail() as Boris Brezillon noted. > > drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c > index 8037d4b48a05..2dac25a8ccbf 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c > @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > dev_err(nfc->dev, > "Only one NAND chip supported!\n"); > err = -EINVAL; > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > nand_set_flash_node(chip, child); > @@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > err = devm_request_irq(nfc->dev, irq, vf610_nfc_irq, 0, DRV_NAME, mtd); > if (err) { > dev_err(nfc->dev, "Error requesting IRQ!\n"); > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > vf610_nfc_preinit_controller(nfc); > @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* first scan to find the device and get the page size */ > err = nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, NULL); > if (err) > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > > vf610_nfc_init_controller(nfc); > > @@ -732,20 +732,20 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize > PAGE_2K + OOB_MAX - 8) { > dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unsupported flash page size\n"); > err = -ENXIO; > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > if (chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) { > if (mtd->writesize != PAGE_2K && mtd->oobsize < 64) { > dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unsupported flash with hwecc\n"); > err = -ENXIO; > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > if (chip->ecc.size != mtd->writesize) { > dev_err(nfc->dev, "Step size needs to be page size\n"); > err = -ENXIO; > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > /* Only 64 byte ECC layouts known */ > @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } else { > dev_err(nfc->dev, "Unsupported ECC strength\n"); > err = -ENXIO; > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > } > > chip->ecc.read_page = vf610_nfc_read_page; > @@ -777,14 +777,19 @@ static int vf610_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > /* second phase scan */ > err = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > if (err) > - goto error; > + goto err_node; > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtd); > > /* Register device in MTD */ > - return mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0); > + err = mtd_device_register(mtd, NULL, 0); > + if (err) > + goto err_nand; > + return 0; > > -error: > +err_nand: > + nand_cleanup(chip); > +err_node: > of_node_put(nand_get_flash_node(chip));
Can you use clearer err labels, like err_put_node and err_cleanup_nand?
> err_clk: > clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->clk);
| |