lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 01/13] x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support
    > Clearly Paul's approach to retpoline without lfence is faster.
    > I'm guessing it wasn't shared with amazon/intel until now and
    > this set of patches going to adopt it, right?
    >
    > Paul, could you share a link to a set of alternative gcc patches
    > that do retpoline similar to llvm diff ?

    I don't think it's a good idea to use any sequence not signed
    off by CPU designers and extensively tested.

    While another one may work for most tests, it could always fail in
    some corner case.

    Right now we have the more heavy weight one and I would
    suggest to stay with that one for now. Then worry
    about more optimizations later.

    Correctness first.

    -Andi

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-01-04 19:40    [W:4.223 / U:0.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site