lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/11] arm64: Implement branch predictor hardening for affected Cortex-A CPUs
From
Date
On 04/01/18 16:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 January 2018 at 15:08, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>> Cortex-A57, A72, A73 and A75 are susceptible to branch predictor aliasing
>> and can theoretically be attacked by malicious code.
>>
>> This patch implements a PSCI-based mitigation for these CPUs when available.
>> The call into firmware will invalidate the branch predictor state, preventing
>> any malicious entries from affecting other victim contexts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
>> index 06a931eb2673..2b10d52a0321 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/bpi.S
>> @@ -53,3 +53,27 @@ ENTRY(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start)
>> vectors __kvm_hyp_vector
>> .endr
>> ENTRY(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_end)
>> +ENTRY(__psci_hyp_bp_inval_start)
>> + stp x0, x1, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x2, x3, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x4, x5, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x6, x7, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x8, x9, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x10, x11, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x12, x13, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x14, x15, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x16, x17, [sp, #-16]!
>> + stp x18, x19, [sp, #-16]!
>
> Would it be better to update sp only once here?

Maybe. I suppose that's quite uarch dependent, but worth trying.

> Also, do x18 and x19 need to be preserved/restored here?

My bad. I misread the SMCCC and though I needed to save it too. For the
reference, the text says:

"Registers X18-X30 and stack pointers SP_EL0 and SP_ELx are saved by
the function that is called, and must be preserved over the SMC or HVC
call."

I'll amend the patch.

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 18:14    [W:0.388 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site