lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> It should be a CPU_BUG bit as we have for the other mess. And that can be
> used for patching.

That would definitely be the right approach.

However, that's also probably quite challenging for the gcc option.

Linus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 01:20    [W:0.077 / U:1.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site