[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] mm, hugetlb: allocation API and migration improvements
On Wed,  3 Jan 2018 10:32:07 +0100 Michal Hocko <> wrote:

> I've posted this as an RFC [1] and both Mike and Naoya seem to be OK
> both with patches and the approach. I have rebased this on top of [2]
> because there is a small conflict in mm/mempolicy.c. I know it is late
> in the release cycle but similarly to [2] I would really like to see
> this in linux-next for a longer time for a wider testing exposure.

I'm interpreting this to mean "hold for 4.17-rc1"?

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-04 01:05    [W:0.063 / U:3.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site