lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    Subject[PATCH 06/16] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification
    Date
    Now that each capability describes how to treat the conflicts
    of CPU cap state vs System wide cap state, we can unify the
    verification logic to a single place.

    Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
    ---
    arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
    1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

    diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
    index 43c7e992d784..79737034a628 100644
    --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
    +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
    @@ -1228,6 +1228,54 @@ static void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *
    }

    /*
    + * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
    + * Returns "false" on conflicts.
    + */
    +static bool __verify_local_cpu_caps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
    +{
    + bool cpu_has_cap, system_has_cap;
    + const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
    +
    + for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
    + cpu_has_cap = __this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability);
    + system_has_cap = cpus_have_cap(caps->capability);
    +
    + if (system_has_cap) {
    + /*
    + * Check if the new CPU misses an advertised feature, which is not
    + * safe to miss.
    + */
    + if (!cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_missing_cap_safe(caps))
    + break;
    + /*
    + * We have to issue enable() irrespective of whether the CPU
    + * has it or not, as it is enabeld system wide. It is upto
    + * the call back to take appropriate action on this CPU.
    + */
    + if (caps->enable)
    + caps->enable(caps);
    + } else {
    + /*
    + * Check if the CPU has this capability if it isn't safe to
    + * have when the system doesn't.
    + */
    + if (cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_have_cap_safe(caps))
    + break;
    + }
    + }
    +
    + if (caps->matches) {
    + pr_crit("CPU%d: Detected conflict for capability %d (%s), System: %d, CPU: %d\n",
    + smp_processor_id(), caps->capability,
    + caps->desc ? : "no description",
    + system_has_cap, cpu_has_cap);
    + return false;
    + }
    +
    + return true;
    +}
    +
    +/*
    * Check for CPU features that are used in early boot
    * based on the Boot CPU value.
    */
    @@ -1249,25 +1297,10 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
    }
    }

    -static void
    -verify_local_cpu_features(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
    +static void verify_local_cpu_features(void)
    {
    - const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
    - for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
    - if (!cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
    - continue;
    - /*
    - * If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we cannot proceed
    - * further, park the cpu.
    - */
    - if (!__this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability)) {
    - pr_crit("CPU%d: missing feature: %s\n",
    - smp_processor_id(), caps->desc);
    - cpu_die_early();
    - }
    - if (caps->enable)
    - caps->enable(caps);
    - }
    + if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_features))
    + cpu_die_early();
    }

    static void verify_sve_features(void)
    @@ -1294,20 +1327,8 @@ static void verify_sve_features(void)
    */
    static void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
    {
    - const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = arm64_errata;
    -
    - for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
    - if (cpus_have_cap(caps->capability)) {
    - if (caps->enable)
    - caps->enable(caps);
    - } else if (caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)) {
    - pr_crit("CPU%d: Requires work around for %s, not detected"
    - " at boot time\n",
    - smp_processor_id(),
    - caps->desc ? : "an erratum");
    - cpu_die_early();
    - }
    - }
    + if (__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_errata))
    + cpu_die_early();
    }

    static void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
    @@ -1331,7 +1352,7 @@ static void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void)
    static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
    {
    verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds();
    - verify_local_cpu_features(arm64_features);
    + verify_local_cpu_features();
    verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);

    if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
    --
    2.13.6
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-01-23 13:31    [W:5.010 / U:0.172 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site