Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | srinivas.kandagatla@linaro ... | Subject | [PATCH 4/6] slimbus: Use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock | Date | Tue, 2 Jan 2018 17:54:22 +0000 |
| |
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> --- drivers/slimbus/messaging.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c index 8b2c77f516b9..a9a6dc4af0da 100644 --- a/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c +++ b/drivers/slimbus/messaging.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int slim_do_transfer(struct slim_controller *ctrl, struct slim_msg_txn *txn) if (need_tid) { spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->txn_lock, flags); tid = idr_alloc(&ctrl->tid_idr, txn, 0, - SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_KERNEL); + SLIM_MAX_TIDS, GFP_ATOMIC); txn->tid = tid; if (!txn->msg->comp) -- 2.15.0
| |