Messages in this thread | | | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Date | Tue, 16 Jan 2018 01:45:50 -0800 | Subject | Re: what trees/branches to test on syzbot |
| |
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Several people proposed that linux-next should not be tested on > syzbot. While some people suggested that it needs to test as many > trees as possible. I've initially included linux-next as it is a > staging area before upstream tree, with the intention that patches are > _tested_ there, is they are not tested there, bugs enter upstream > tree. And then it takes much longer to get fix into other trees. > > So the question is: what trees/branches should be tested? Preferably > in priority order as syzbot can't test all of them. >
I always thought that -next existed specifically to give people a chance to test the code in it. Maybe the question is where to report the test results ?
Guenter
| |