[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: what trees/branches to test on syzbot
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <> wrote:
> Hello,
> Several people proposed that linux-next should not be tested on
> syzbot. While some people suggested that it needs to test as many
> trees as possible. I've initially included linux-next as it is a
> staging area before upstream tree, with the intention that patches are
> _tested_ there, is they are not tested there, bugs enter upstream
> tree. And then it takes much longer to get fix into other trees.
> So the question is: what trees/branches should be tested? Preferably
> in priority order as syzbot can't test all of them.

I always thought that -next existed specifically to give people a
chance to test the code in it. Maybe the question is where to report
the test results ?


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-16 10:46    [W:0.095 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site