lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] drbd: fix discard_zeroes_if_aligned regression
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> NAK. Calling a discard and expecting zeroing is simply buggy.

But of course, that would be silly.

We don't expect discard to zero---but we do expect discard to discard!

> And double NAK for patches like this without a linux-block Cc.

My appologies, I thought this was internal to DRBD.

What is the general rule here?

Should linux-block always be Cc'ed with a patch?

--
Eric Wheeler

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-18 00:19    [W:0.092 / U:0.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site