lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 4/7] x86/hyper-v: redirect reenlightment notifications on CPU offlining
Date
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:

> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> +static int hv_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + struct hv_reenlightenment_control re_ctrl;
>> + int i;
>> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
>> +
>> + if (hv_reenlightenment_cb == NULL)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /* Make sure the CPU we migrate to is not going away too */
>> + spin_lock(&lock);
>
> What kind of voodoo is this? CPU hotplug is serialized already...
>

Yes, someone around made a comment 'what happens if some day we'll have
parallel cpu hot[un]plug' and I added this. Not really needed, will drop
in v3.

>> + rdmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_REENLIGHTENMENT_CONTROL, *((u64 *)&re_ctrl));
>> + if (re_ctrl.target_vp == hv_vp_index[cpu]) {
>> + /* Find some other online CPU */
>> + for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>
> cpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask);
>
> Hmm?
>

Cool, thanks)

--
Vitaly

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-01-15 11:44    [W:0.036 / U:2.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site