Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:23:22 -0800 | From | Tony Lindgren <> | Subject | Re: PM regression in next |
| |
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [180112 00:18]: > On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:01:13 -0800 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm seeing a considerable idle power consumption regression in > > Linux next, with power consumption for my idle test system going > > to 17.5mW compared to the usual 8mW on my test device. > > > > Git bisect points to merge commit e130bc1d00a4 ("Merge branch > > 'akpm-current/current'") being the first bad commit. > > > > I have also verified that commit 70286688e5ad ("ipc/mqueue.c: > > have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is good, and > > commit e2d7fe89e8ae ("Merge remote-tracking branch > > 'init_task/init_task'") is good. > > Do you mean that everything up to and including 70286688e5ad > ("ipc/mqueue.c: have RT tasks queue in by priority in wq_add()") is > good?
Yes I'm not seeing the regression in your branch at commit 70286688e5ad. I'm seeing it only with the merge commit e130bc1d00a4.
Regards,
Tony
| |