[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC 00/17] Pile o' entry stack changes

* Andy Lutomirski <> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Andi Kleen <> wrote:
> > Andy Lutomirski <> writes:
> >>
> >> - Lots of people (Linus included) have asked to convert the entry
> >> code to pop registers on exit instead of movqing them off the
> >> stack. This makes a bunch of progress in that direction.
> >
> > You should benchmark it on Atoms. Likely it's a regression there
> > because they don't have the special PUSH/POP acceleration.
> I'm not entirely sure this is a worthwhile reason. Atom will lose a
> few cycles due to POP throughput, but there's a lot less decode
> bandwidth needed and we save a cache line or two.

I think we can also safely assume that Atom will eventually either join the
21st century or die out - mild Atom micro-costs are not a good reason to
complicate the entry code...



 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-07 09:05    [W:0.062 / U:9.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site