Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3] e1000e: Be drop monitor friendly | From | "Neftin, Sasha" <> | Date | Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:06:39 +0300 |
| |
On 8/26/2017 04:14, Florian Fainelli wrote: > e1000e_put_txbuf() can be called from normal reclamation path as well as > when a DMA mapping failure, so we need to differentiate these two cases > when freeing SKBs to be drop monitor friendly. e1000e_tx_hwtstamp_work() > and e1000_remove() are processing TX timestamped SKBs and those should > not be accounted as drops either. > > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > --- > Changes in v3: > > - differentiate normal reclamation from TX DMA fragment mapping errors > - removed a few invalid dev_kfree_skb() replacements (those are already > drop monitor friendly) > > Changes in v2: > > - make it compile > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > index 327dfe5bedc0..cfd21858c095 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > @@ -1071,7 +1071,8 @@ static bool e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_ring *rx_ring, int *work_done, > } > > static void e1000_put_txbuf(struct e1000_ring *tx_ring, > - struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info) > + struct e1000_buffer *buffer_info, > + bool drop) > { > struct e1000_adapter *adapter = tx_ring->adapter; > > @@ -1085,7 +1086,10 @@ static void e1000_put_txbuf(struct e1000_ring *tx_ring, > buffer_info->dma = 0; > } > if (buffer_info->skb) { > - dev_kfree_skb_any(buffer_info->skb); > + if (drop) > + dev_kfree_skb_any(buffer_info->skb); > + else > + dev_consume_skb_any(buffer_info->skb); > buffer_info->skb = NULL; > } > buffer_info->time_stamp = 0; > @@ -1199,7 +1203,7 @@ static void e1000e_tx_hwtstamp_work(struct work_struct *work) > wmb(); /* force write prior to skb_tstamp_tx */ > > skb_tstamp_tx(skb, &shhwtstamps); > - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); > + dev_consume_skb_any(skb); > } else if (time_after(jiffies, adapter->tx_hwtstamp_start > + adapter->tx_timeout_factor * HZ)) { > dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb); > @@ -1254,7 +1258,7 @@ static bool e1000_clean_tx_irq(struct e1000_ring *tx_ring) > } > } > > - e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info); > + e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info, false); > tx_desc->upper.data = 0; > > i++; > @@ -2421,7 +2425,7 @@ static void e1000_clean_tx_ring(struct e1000_ring *tx_ring) > > for (i = 0; i < tx_ring->count; i++) { > buffer_info = &tx_ring->buffer_info[i]; > - e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info); > + e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info, false); > } > > netdev_reset_queue(adapter->netdev); > @@ -5614,7 +5618,7 @@ static int e1000_tx_map(struct e1000_ring *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb, > i += tx_ring->count; > i--; > buffer_info = &tx_ring->buffer_info[i]; > - e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info); > + e1000_put_txbuf(tx_ring, buffer_info, true); > } > > return 0; > @@ -7411,7 +7415,7 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) > if (adapter->flags & FLAG_HAS_HW_TIMESTAMP) { > cancel_work_sync(&adapter->tx_hwtstamp_work); > if (adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb) { > - dev_kfree_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb); > + dev_consume_skb_any(adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb); > adapter->tx_hwtstamp_skb = NULL; > } > }
i am ok with this patch
| |