lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH REBASED 3/6] s390: Add __down_read_killable()
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:36:12PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:20:02 +0200
> Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:06:18PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > > Similar to __down_write_killable(), and read killable primitive.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/rwsem.h
> >
> > FWIW, while looking into this patch I realized that we never optimized our
> > rwsem primitives to make use of new atomic instructions.
> >
> > The generic rwsem header file however does, since it uses atomic ops which
> > we did optimize. Even when compiling for old machines the generic version
> > generates better code. Therefore I will remove the 15 years old s390
> > implementation and switch to the generic version instead.
>
> Take care not to conflict with the queued spinlock/rwlock patches on the
> features branch.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=features&id=eb3b7b848fb3dd00f7a57d633d4ae4d194aa7865
>
> Me thinks that what you have in mind is already done.

No, it's not done. You probably mixed up rwlocks and rwsems?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-30 12:40    [W:0.045 / U:12.744 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site