Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [media] spca500: Use common error handling code in spca500_synch310() | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Date | Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:40:35 +0200 |
| |
>> return 0; >> -error: >> + >> +report_failure: >> + PERR("Set packet size: set interface error"); >> return -EBUSY; >> } > > Why change the label name?
I find the suggested variant a bi better.
> They are both equally uninformative.
Which identifier would you find appropriate there?
Regards, Markus
| |