lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 08/13] xen/pvcalls: implement accept command
From
Date

> +int pvcalls_front_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags)
> +{
> + struct pvcalls_bedata *bedata;
> + struct sock_mapping *map;
> + struct sock_mapping *map2 = NULL;
> + struct xen_pvcalls_request *req;
> + int notify, req_id, ret, evtchn, nonblock;
> +
> + pvcalls_enter;
> + if (!pvcalls_front_dev) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -ENOTCONN;
> + }
> + bedata = dev_get_drvdata(&pvcalls_front_dev->dev);
> +
> + map = (struct sock_mapping *) sock->sk->sk_send_head;
> + if (!map) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -ENOTSOCK;
> + }
> +
> + if (map->passive.status != PVCALLS_STATUS_LISTEN) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + nonblock = flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK;
> + /*
> + * Backend only supports 1 inflight accept request, will return
> + * errors for the others
> + */
> + if (test_and_set_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
> + (void *)&map->passive.flags)) {
> + req_id = READ_ONCE(map->passive.inflight_req_id);
> + if (req_id != PVCALLS_INVALID_ID &&
> + READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) == req_id) {
> + map2 = map->passive.accept_map;
> + goto received;
> + }
> + if (nonblock) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + if (wait_event_interruptible(map->passive.inflight_accept_req,
> + !test_and_set_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT,
> + (void *)&map->passive.flags))) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -EINTR;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + ret = get_request(bedata, &req_id);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return ret;
> + }
> + map2 = kzalloc(sizeof(*map2), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (map2 == NULL) {
> + spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + ret = create_active(map2, &evtchn);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + kfree(map2);
> + spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }

Do you need to clear PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT bit on errors (except
for EAGAIN/EINTR)?

> + list_add_tail(&map2->list, &bedata->socket_mappings);
> +
> + req = RING_GET_REQUEST(&bedata->ring, req_id);
> + req->req_id = req_id;
> + req->cmd = PVCALLS_ACCEPT;
> + req->u.accept.id = (uint64_t) map;
> + req->u.accept.ref = map2->active.ref;
> + req->u.accept.id_new = (uint64_t) map2;
> + req->u.accept.evtchn = evtchn;
> + map->passive.accept_map = map2;
> +
> + bedata->ring.req_prod_pvt++;
> + RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&bedata->ring, notify);
> + spin_unlock(&bedata->socket_lock);
> + if (notify)
> + notify_remote_via_irq(bedata->irq);
> + /* We could check if we have received a response before returning. */
> + if (nonblock) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(map->passive.inflight_req_id, req_id);
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + if (wait_event_interruptible(bedata->inflight_req,
> + READ_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id) == req_id)) {
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -EINTR;
> + }
> +
> +received:
> + map2->sock = newsock;
> + newsock->sk = kzalloc(sizeof(*newsock->sk), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!newsock->sk) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> + WRITE_ONCE(map->passive.inflight_req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> + pvcalls_front_free_map(bedata, map2);
> + kfree(map2);
> + pvcalls_exit;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + newsock->sk->sk_send_head = (void *)map2;
> +
> + clear_bit(PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT, (void *)&map->passive.flags);
> + wake_up(&map->passive.inflight_accept_req);
> +
> + ret = bedata->rsp[req_id].ret;
> + /* read ret, then set this rsp slot to be reused */
> + smp_mb();
> + WRITE_ONCE(bedata->rsp[req_id].req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);
> + WRITE_ONCE(map->passive.inflight_req_id, PVCALLS_INVALID_ID);

Should inflight_req_id be cleared at the same time as
PVCALLS_FLAG_ACCEPT_INFLIGHT? They kind of belong together, don't they?

And I wonder whether you actually need the flag --- can you just key off
map->passive.inflight_req_id not being PVCALLS_INVALID_ID?

(and again, I am not sure about all READ/WRITE_ONCE() macros here).


-boris

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-22 02:01    [W:0.228 / U:2.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site