lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 00/40] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support
From
Date
Hi Steve,

On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 16:20 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:44:28 -0500
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments
> > except for:
> >
> > - PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints
> >
> > which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what
> > exactly I need to do there.
>
> Let me know if you need any help.
>

OK, thanks.

> >
> > I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in
> > which you had mentioned you were going to send for:
> >
> > - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken
>
> OK, I have a stand alone patch that you don't need to fold in that does
> this properly. I tested the crap out of it (missed a few places), but
> should be good. I'll send that netx.
>
>
> > - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion
>
> I have this working too, but want to test it a little more before
> sending. Once I do, you can add both patches ahead of your series. I
> may just apply them to my tree now and start running them through my
> formal tests.
>

Thanks for these patches - testing now with the mutex patch you just
sent and the old trace_recursive_lock() patch, hope to have a v3 out
soon.

Tom



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-21 23:12    [W:0.078 / U:14.076 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site