Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/11] mux: consumer.h: Add MUX_USB_* state constant defines | | From | Hans de Goede <> | | Date | Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:46:12 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
On 02-09-17 21:06, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 05:59:14PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 02-09-17 16:59, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On 09/01/2017 02:48 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>>> Add MUX_USB_* state constant defines, which can be used by USB >>>> device/host and Type-C polarity/role/altmode mux drivers and consumers >>>> to ensure that they agree on the meaning of the mux_control_select() >>>> state argument. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> include/linux/mux/consumer.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mux/consumer.h b/include/linux/mux/consumer.h >>>> index 912dd48a3a5d..e3ec9b4db962 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/mux/consumer.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mux/consumer.h >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,22 @@ >>>> #include <linux/compiler.h> >>>> +/* >>>> + * Mux state values for USB muxes, used for both USB device/host role muxes >>>> + * as well as for Type-C polarity/role/altmode muxes. >>>> + * >>>> + * MUX_USB_POLARITY_INV may be or-ed together with any other mux-state as >>>> + * inverted-polarity (Type-C plugged in upside down) can happen with any >>>> + * other mux-state. >>>> + */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_POLARITY_INV BIT(0) /* Polarity inverted bit */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_NONE (1 << 1) /* Mux open / not connected */ >>> >>> >>> Why BIT(0) but (1 << 1) and so on ? >> >> Because the polarity can be or-ed together with any of the other options. >> Each option can be selected normal and inverted polarity (connector >> inserted upside down). >> > Ah yes, it is (2 << 1), not (1 << 2).
Ack.
> But then why don't the options start > with (0 << 1) ?
Because I somehow thought that would conflict with the polarity bit which of course it will not, so I will fix this for v2.
Note I used BIT(0) for the flag and not say BIT(8) because the mux subsys expects a mux-driver to declare a max value for the state parameter to mux_control_select(), which is what the MUX_USB_STATES define is for. If I were to use say BIT(8) for the polarity then the MUX_USB_STATES value would become (256 + 5) even though we only have 12 unique states.
> I'll have to look into the series more closely;
Thank you.
> so far the polarity was > a separate parameter to tcpm_mux_set() and the low level API.
Right, I've kept the polarity as a separate parameter at the tcpm level, but the mux_control_select() function has only one argument, so I or the polarity and the alt-mode to mux for together there.
Regards,
Hans
> > Guenter > >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> >>>> +#define MUX_USB_DEVICE (2 << 1) /* USB device mode */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_HOST (3 << 1) /* USB host mode */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_HOST_AND_DP_SRC (4 << 1) /* USB host + 2 lanes Display Port */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_DP_SRC (5 << 1) /* 4 lanes Display Port source */ >>>> +#define MUX_USB_STATES (6 << 1) >>>> + >>>> struct device; >>>> struct mux_control; >>>> >>>
|  |