Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:46:52 -0700 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] drivers: Add boot constraints core |
| |
On 04-09-17, 11:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:15:47AM +0200, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 29-08-17, 14:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Who couldn't reach an agreement? > > > > Rob Herring (DT Maintainer) didn't like the first set of bindings and wasn't > > convinced that we need any new bindings for this purpose to begin with. > > So Rob wanted more kernel code and less bindings?
We had a similar thread sometime back (Performance states for power domains), where we couldn't get to the bindings in the first go. Rob suggested that we can actually get the code in first and then we can look at how to get stuff from DT once we understand it more.
He wasn't happy with the bindings I proposed and so I took the same approach here. Its not a lot of code we are going to have to remove once we move to DT, so it ain't that bad.
> Ok, I'll ask for Rob to sign off on these patches then :)
I can't give any guarantee of that ;)
> As you have the source for a number of such systems, you might want to > verify this please.
I will try to talk to few guys during Linaro connect next week and also look into source for such stuff.
> Also, what is going to cause any new systems to use > this new api?
As far as my part go, I can do my best to advertise it with articles and presentations. But eventually people have to get motivated to use it themselves :)
What else can I do as an author here? I will do whatever it takes to get people to use it.
-- viresh
| |