[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tcp: avoid bogus warning in tcp_clean_rtx_queue
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:02 PM, David Miller <> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:48:47 +0200
>> gcc-4.9 warns that it cannot trace the state of the 'last_ackt'
>> variable since the change to the TCP timestamping code, when
>> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c: In function 'tcp_clean_rtx_queue':
>> include/net/tcp.h:757:23: error: 'last_ackt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>> Other gcc versions, both older and newer do now show this
>> warning. Removing the 'likely' annotation makes it go away,
>> and has no effect on the object code without
>> CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES, as tested with gcc-4.9
>> and gcc-7.1.1, so this seems to be a safe workaround.
>> Fixes: 9a568de4818d ("tcp: switch TCP TS option (RFC 7323) to 1ms clock")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <>
> This reaches the limits at which I am willing to work around compiler
> stuff.

I see. It is a definitely a really obscure case, so if there is any doubt
that the workaround is harmless, then we shouldn't take it. The warning
only shows up on gcc-4.9 but not anything newer, and we disable
-Wmaybe-uninitialized on all older versions because of the false

It's also possible that it needed a combination of multiple other options,
with gcc-4.9 to see if anything would show up that we don't also get a
warning for in gcc-7, and this came up once in several hundred randconfig
builds across multiple architectures (no other new warnings appeared
with gcc-4.9).

> What cpu did you test the object code generation upon and does that
> cpu have branch prediction hints in the target you are building for?

This was a randconfig build targetting ARMv5. I'm pretty sure that has
no such hint instructions.


 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-19 23:33    [W:0.061 / U:0.964 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site