Messages in this thread | | | From | Joel Stanley <> | Date | Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:49:44 +0930 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: Add Aspeed G5 clock driver |
| |
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 15:39 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote: >> This driver supports the ast2500 and derivative BMC SoCs from Aspeed. >> >> All of the important clocks are supported, with most non-essential ones >> also implemented where information is available. I am working with >> Aspeed to clear up some of the missing information, including the >> missing parent-sibling relationships. >> >> We need to know the rate of the apb clock in order to correctly program >> the clocksource driver, so the apb and it's parents are created in the >> CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER callback. >> >> The rest of the clocks are created at normal driver probe time. I >> followed the Gemini driver's lead with using the regmap where I could, >> but also having a pointer to the base address for use with the common >> clock callbacks. >> >> > Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> >> --- >> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 12 + >> drivers/clk/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c | 547 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > The patch subject suggests the implementation is specific to the G5 > series SoC, but the name of the driver is generic. How similar are the > G4 and G5 clock devices? Is the intent to expand the implementation to > also cover the G4 series, or should this be renamed to something more > specific?
The intent is to cover the G4 platforms with the same driver. I sent this version along early to get feedback on the structure.
As it turns out, it was simple to get the G4 going with the same code. I'll send a v2 in the next day or so.
Cheers,
Joel
| |