lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/12] x86/crypto: Fix RBP usage in several crypto .S files
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 07:34:31AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:33:03PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > And here's v2 of the sha512-avx2 patch. It should hopefully gain back
> > > most of the performance lost by v1.
> > >
> > > From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] x86/crypto: Fix RBP usage in sha512-avx2-asm.S
> > >
> > > Using RBP as a temporary register breaks frame pointer convention and
> > > breaks stack traces when unwinding from an interrupt in the crypto code.
> > >
> > > Mix things up a little bit to get rid of the RBP usage, without
> > > destroying performance. Use RDI instead of RBP for the TBL pointer.
> > > That will clobber CTX, so save CTX on the stack and use RDI as CTX
> > > before it gets clobbered, and R12 as CTX after it gets clobbered.
> > >
> > > Also remove the unused y4 variable.
> > >
> >
> > I tested the v2 patches for both sha256-avx2 and sha512-avx2 on Skylake. They
> > both pass the crypto self-tests, and there was no noticable performance
> > difference compared to the unpatched versions. Thanks!
>
> Cool, thanks for review and the testing! Can we add your Tested-by + Acked-by tags
> to the patches?
>

Yes, that's fine for all the patches in the series.

Will these patches go in through the crypto tree or through the x86 tree?

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-09-15 18:08    [W:0.107 / U:0.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site