lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: iproc: Add optional brcm,pci-hotplug
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Oza Oza <oza.oza@broadcom.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/8/2017 10:22 PM, Oza Oza wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please send bindings to DT list.
>>>
>>> Sure, will do that.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Add description for optional device tree property
>>>>> 'brcm,pci-hotplug' for PCI hotplug feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
>>>>> index b8e48b4..a3bad24 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
>>>>> @@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>> - brcm,pcie-msi-inten: Needs to be present for some older iProc
>>>>> platforms that
>>>>> require the interrupt enable registers to be set explicitly to enable
>>>>> MSI
>>>>>
>>>>> +Optional properties:
>>>>> +- brcm,pci-hotplug: PCI hotplug feature is supported.
>>>>
>>>> I think we should make this a common property. We already have
>>>> "ibm,slot-pluggable", so I'd propose "slot-pluggable".
>>>>
>>>> There's also "hotpluggable" for memory nodes defined, so we could
>>>> reuse that here.
>>>>
>>> ok I will rename this to
>>> brcm,slot-pluggable
>>
>>
>> How's brcm,slot-pluggable a common property? It's still brcm specific.
>> Didn't Rob propose either "slot-pluggable" or "hotpluggable"?
>>
>> And note it goes to the generic PCI binding instead iProc PCIe specific
>> binding.
>>
>
> Initially I thought, Rob suggested either "slot-pluggable".
> followed by, "hotpluggable" since memory node already has such property.
>
> but not sure in which generic pci binding I should add ?
> should it be part of
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt
>
> Can you please clarify Rob ?
>
> Regards,
> Oza.

To add, every SOC might have different way of implementing hotplug.
so I suppose both the binding documents have to be updated.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt
which can have common boolean property
named "hotpluggable"

and SOC specific implementation can stay here
for e.g.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/brcm,iproc-pcie.txt
brcm,prsnt-gpios

Rob and Ray:
please let me know how this sounds.

Regards,
Oza.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-09 07:53    [W:0.063 / U:0.744 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site