lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 06:24:39PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > And there obviously _should_ not be any dependencies between those. A
>
> 100% right. Since there obviously should not be any, it would be better
> to check them. So I've endlessly asked you 'do you have any reason removing
> the opportunity for that check?'. Overhead? Logical problem? Or want to
> believe workqueue setup code perfect forever? I mean, is it a problem if we
> check them?

Nothing is perfect. And cross-release less that others. Covering that
case for the first few works really isn't worth it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-31 10:08    [W:0.179 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site