lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] irqchip: irq-bcm7120-l2: Use correct I/O accessors for irq_fwd_mask
From
Date
On 29/08/17 19:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Initialization of irq_fwd_mask was done using __raw_readl() which
> happens to work for all cases except when using ARM BE8 which requires
> readl() (with the proper swapping). Move the initialization of the

s/readl/writel/, I presume?

> irq_fwd_mask till later when we have correctly defined our I/O
> accessors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> index 64c2692070ef..983640eba418 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7120-l2.c
> @@ -250,12 +250,6 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct device_node *dn,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_free_l1_data;
>
> - for (idx = 0; idx < data->n_words; idx++) {
> - __raw_writel(data->irq_fwd_mask[idx],
> - data->pair_base[idx] +
> - data->en_offset[idx]);
> - }
> -
> for (irq = 0; irq < data->num_parent_irqs; irq++) {
> ret = bcm7120_l2_intc_init_one(dn, data, irq, valid_mask);
> if (ret)
> @@ -297,6 +291,10 @@ static int __init bcm7120_l2_intc_probe(struct device_node *dn,
> gc->reg_base = data->pair_base[idx];
> ct->regs.mask = data->en_offset[idx];
>
> + /* gc->reg_base is defined and so is gc->writel */
> + irq_reg_writel(gc, data->irq_fwd_mask[idx],
> + data->en_offset[idx]);
> +
> ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_clr_bit;
> ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_mask_set_bit;
> ct->chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_noop;
>

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-30 12:48    [W:0.043 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site