lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: printk: what is going on with additional newlines?
On (08/29/17 18:52), Joe Perches wrote:
[..]
> > We could simply add a seq_buf_printk() that is implemented in the printk
> > proper, to parse the seq_buf buffer properly, and add the timestamps and
> > such.
>
> No need. printk would already add timestamps.

the idea is not to do printk() on that seq buffer at all, but to
log_store(), atomically, seq buffer messages

spin_lock(&logbuf_lock)
while (offset < seq_buffer->len) {
...
log_store(seq->buffer + offset);
...
}
spin_unlock(&logbuf_unlock)

-ss

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-30 04:23    [W:0.256 / U:1.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site