lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 11/20] rpmsg: glink: Fix idr_lock from mutex to spinlock
From
Date
Hi Sricharan,

Minor bug in this patch.

On 8/24/2017 12:21 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
[..]
> @@ -829,11 +839,14 @@ static int qcom_glink_rx_open(struct qcom_glink *glink, unsigned int rcid,
> struct device_node *node;
> int lcid;
> int ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&glink->idr_lock, flags);
> idr_for_each_entry(&glink->lcids, channel, lcid) {
> if (!strcmp(channel->name, name))
> break;
> }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&glink->idr_lock, flags);
>
> if (!channel) {
> channel = qcom_glink_alloc_channel(glink, name);
> @@ -844,15 +857,15 @@ static int qcom_glink_rx_open(struct qcom_glink *glink, unsigned int rcid,
> create_device = true;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&glink->idr_lock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&glink->idr_lock, flags);
> ret = idr_alloc(&glink->rcids, channel, rcid, rcid + 1, GFP_KERNEL);

I think GFP_KERNEL should be changed to GFP_ATOMIC if the mutex is
changed to spinlock.

Thanks,
Chris
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-28 23:52    [W:0.193 / U:1.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site