lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
From
Date
On 25/08/2017 18:53, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks for the tip, I have expanded the patch to cover tdp cases and
> have verified
> that it works fine with SME enabled KVM. If you are okay with this then
> I can
> send patch.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index ccb70b8..7a8edc0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -4109,16 +4109,30 @@ void
> reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu
> *context)
> {
> bool uses_nx = context->nx || context->base_role.smep_andnot_wp;
> + struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
> + int i;
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index ccb70b8..7a8edc0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -4109,16 +4109,30 @@ void
> reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu
> *context)
> {
> bool uses_nx = context->nx || context->base_role.smep_andnot_wp;
> + struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
> + int i;
>
> /*
> * Passing "true" to the last argument is okay; it adds a check
> * on bit 8 of the SPTEs which KVM doesn't use anyway.
> */
> - __reset_rsvds_bits_mask(vcpu, &context->shadow_zero_check,
> + shadow_zero_check = &context->shadow_zero_check;
> + __reset_rsvds_bits_mask(vcpu, shadow_zero_check,
> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits,
> context->shadow_root_level, uses_nx,
> guest_cpuid_has_gbpages(vcpu),
> is_pse(vcpu),
> true);
> +
> + if (!shadow_me_mask)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = context->shadow_root_level; --i >= 0;) {
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][0] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][1] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][2] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][3] &= ~shadow_me_mask;

Neither my version nor yours is correct. :) The right one has [0][i]
and [1][i] (I inverted the indices by mistake).

With that change, you can include my

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

> + }
> +
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(reset_shadow_zero_bits_mask);
>
> @@ -4136,8 +4150,13 @@ static void
> reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_mmu *context)
> {
> + struct rsvd_bits_validate *shadow_zero_check;
> + int i;
> +
> + shadow_zero_check = &context->shadow_zero_check;
> +
> if (boot_cpu_is_amd())
> - __reset_rsvds_bits_mask(vcpu, &context->shadow_zero_check,
> + __reset_rsvds_bits_mask(vcpu, shadow_zero_check,
> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits,
> context->shadow_root_level, false,
> boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES),

Please use shadow_zero_check here too:

__reset_rsvds_bits_mask_ept(&context->shadow_zero_check,

Thanks,

Paolo

> @@ -4147,6 +4166,15 @@ reset_tdp_shadow_zero_bits_mask(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits,
> false);
>
> + if (!shadow_me_mask)
> + return;
> +
> + for (i = context->shadow_root_level; --i >= 0;) {
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][0] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][1] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][2] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + shadow_zero_check->rsvd_bits_mask[i][3] &= ~shadow_me_mask;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> index 3cc7255..d7d248a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
>
> static inline u64 rsvd_bits(int s, int e)
> {
> - return __sme_clr(((1ULL << (e - s + 1)) - 1) << s);
> + return ((1ULL << (e - s + 1)) - 1) << s;
> }
>
> void kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask(u64 mmio_mask, u64 mmio_value);
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-25 22:06    [W:0.052 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site