lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/5] ACPI / blacklist: add acpi_match_platform_list()
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:54:43PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> ACPI OEM ID / OEM Table ID / Revision can be used to identify
> a platform based on ACPI firmware info. acpi_blacklisted(),
> intel_pstate_platform_pwr_mgmt_exists(), and some other funcs,
> have been using similar check to detect a list of platforms
> that require special handlings.
>
> Move the platform check in acpi_blacklisted() to a new common
> utility function, acpi_match_platform_list(), so that other
> drivers do not have to implement their own version.
>
> There is no change in functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/blacklist.c | 83 ++++++++--------------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/utils.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/acpi.h | 19 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)

...

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> index b9d956c..0a9e597 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> @@ -816,3 +816,39 @@ static int __init acpi_backlight(char *str)
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("acpi_backlight=", acpi_backlight);
> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_match_platform_list - Check if the system matches with a given list
> + * @plat: pointer to acpi_platform_list table terminated by a NULL entry
> + *
> + * Return the matched index if the system is found in the platform list.
> + * Otherwise, return a negative error code.
> + */
> +int acpi_match_platform_list(const struct acpi_platform_list *plat)
> +{
> + struct acpi_table_header hdr;
> + int idx = 0;
> +
> + if (acpi_disabled)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (; plat->oem_id[0]; plat++, idx++) {
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_table_header(plat->table, 0, &hdr)))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (strncmp(plat->oem_id, hdr.oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (strncmp(plat->oem_table_id, hdr.oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE))
> + continue;
> +
> + if ((plat->pred == all_versions) ||
> + (plat->pred == less_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision <= plat->oem_revision) ||
> + (plat->pred == greater_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision >= plat->oem_revision) ||
> + (plat->pred == equal && hdr.oem_revision == plat->oem_revision))

If you align the second part of the test like this:

if ((plat->pred == all_versions) ||
(plat->pred == less_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision <= plat->oem_revision) ||
(plat->pred == greater_than_or_equal && hdr.oem_revision >= plat->oem_revision) ||
(plat->pred == equal && hdr.oem_revision == plat->oem_revision))

it gets maximally readable. But I'd leave that up to Rafael when committing
- no need to send another version.

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-24 09:54    [W:0.105 / U:3.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site