lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure

> > Yes, my wording was a bit too strong. It is possible, sure. Yet, I
> > understood that one of the features of I3C is to have in-band interrupt
> > support. We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving
> > pins" is higher.
> >
>
> Indeed, you can use in-band interrupts if your device is able to
> generate them, but that doesn't prevent I3C device designers from using
> an external pin to signal interrupts if they prefer.

Exactly. Thus, "We will see if the demand for backward compatibility or "saving
pins" is higher" :)

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-02 12:22    [W:0.058 / U:8.848 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site