lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v8 07/28] x86/mpx: Do not use SIB.base if its value is 101b and ModRM.mod = 0
Date
Section 2.2.1.2 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that if a SIB byte is used and
SIB.base is 101b and ModRM.mod is zero, then the base part of the base
part of the effective address computation is null. To signal this
situation, a -EDOM error is returned to indicate callers to ignore the
base value present in the register operand.

In this scenario, a 32-bit displacement follows the SIB byte. Displacement
is obtained when the instruction decoder parses the operands.

Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Nathan Howard <liverlint@gmail.com>
Cc: Adan Hawthorn <adanhawthorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
index 892aa6468805..53e24ca01f29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -123,6 +123,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,

case REG_TYPE_BASE:
regno = X86_SIB_BASE(insn->sib.value);
+ /*
+ * If ModRM.mod is 0 and SIB.base == 5, the base of the
+ * register-indirect addressing is 0. In this case, a
+ * 32-bit displacement follows the SIB byte.
+ */
+ if (!X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) && regno == 5)
+ return -EDOM;
+
if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
regno += 8;
break;
@@ -164,17 +172,21 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
} else {
if (insn->sib.nbytes) {
+ /*
+ * Negative values in the base and index offset means
+ * an error when decoding the SIB byte. Except -EDOM,
+ * which means that the registers should not be used
+ * in the address computation.
+ */
base_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_BASE);
- if (base_offset < 0)
+ if (base_offset == -EDOM)
+ base = 0;
+ else if (base_offset < 0)
goto out_err;
+ else
+ base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);

indx_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_INDEX);
-
- /*
- * A negative offset generally means a error, except
- * -EDOM, which means that the contents of the register
- * should not be used as index.
- */
if (indx_offset == -EDOM)
indx = 0;
else if (indx_offset < 0)
@@ -182,8 +194,6 @@ static void __user *mpx_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
else
indx = regs_get_register(regs, indx_offset);

- base = regs_get_register(regs, base_offset);
-
eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
} else {
addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
--
2.13.0
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-19 02:35    [W:0.294 / U:3.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site