lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] cgroup: Implement cgroup2 basic CPU usage accounting
Hi Tejun!

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:37:54AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> In cgroup1, while cpuacct isn't actually controlling any resources, it
> is a separate controller due to combinaton of two factors -

s/combinaton/combination

> @@ -4466,6 +4470,8 @@ static void css_free_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> */
> cgroup_put(cgroup_parent(cgrp));
> kernfs_put(cgrp->kn);
> + if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp))
> + cgroup_stat_exit(cgrp);

It looks like this "if (cgroup_on_dfl(cgrp))" works here and further similar to
"#ifdef CGROUP_V2". I wonder, if it's better to move this check into the
calling function: cgroup_stat_exit() in this case.


> +void cgroup_stat_show_cputime(struct seq_file *seq, const char *prefix)
> +{

What are any other possible prefix values except "cpu."?

> +void __init cgroup_stat_boot(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + raw_spin_lock_init(per_cpu_ptr(&cgroup_cpu_stat_lock, cpu));
> +
> + WARN_ON(cgroup_stat_init(&cgrp_dfl_root.cgrp));

I'm not sure WARN_ON() is enough here: if cgroup_stat_init() returned -ENOMEM,
the following OOPS is not avoidable, as you don't check cpu_stat pointer.
But it's very unlikely, of course.


Overall looks very good!

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-17 14:10    [W:0.197 / U:19.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site