Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: spi-nor: add support for GD25Q256 | From | Cyrille Pitchen <> | Date | Tue, 15 Aug 2017 18:04:48 +0200 |
| |
Hi Andy,
Le 25/07/2017 à 12:12, Andy Yan a écrit : > Add support for GD25Q256, a 32MiB SPI Nor > flash from Gigadevice. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> > > --- > > Changes in v4: > - add SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK and SPI_NOR_HAS_TB
Between v3 and v4, I see that you've also changed the procedure to the the Quad Enable bit on all Gigadevice memories with QSPI capabilities. This is not a detail and should have been reported here.
> > Changes in v3: > - rebase on top of spi-nor tree > - add SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES flag > > Changes in v2: > - drop one line unnecessary modification > > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > index 196b52f..e4145cd 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c > @@ -986,6 +986,11 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_ids[] = { > SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | > SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB) > }, > + { > + "gd25q256", INFO(0xc84019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512, > + SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | > + SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES | SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB) > + }, > > /* Intel/Numonyx -- xxxs33b */ > { "160s33b", INFO(0x898911, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) }, > @@ -2365,6 +2370,7 @@ static int spi_nor_init_params(struct spi_nor *nor, > SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_QUAD)) { > switch (JEDEC_MFR(info)) { > case SNOR_MFR_MACRONIX: > + case SNOR_MFR_GIGADEVICE: > params->quad_enable = macronix_quad_enable;
Here, you've have changed the Quad Enable requirement for *all* Gigadevice memories with Quad SPI capabilities.
However, I'm reading the GD25Q128 datasheet and it claims that the QE bit is BIT(1) of the Status Register 2. Hence some spansion*_quad_enable() should be used, as before your patch.
Then, still according to the datasheet, the GD25Q128 memory is compliant with the JESD216 specification (minor 0) but neither with rev A (minor 5) nor rev B (minor 6). So its Basic Flash Parameter Table is limited to 9 DWORDs instead of 16 DWORDs, hence doesn't provide the Quad Enable requirements. It means that the SFDP tables would not help to select the right _quad_enable() function by overriding the choice made by the switch() statement above.
tl;dr This chunk would introduce a regression with some already supported Gigadevice memories. So I reject this patch, sorry.
Best regards,
Cyrille
> break; > >
| |