[lkml]   [2017]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [v5 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer
On 08/15/2017 10:15 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Generally, oom_score_adj should have a meaning only on a cgroup level,
> so extending it to the system level doesn't sound as a good idea.

But wasn't the original purpose of oom_score (and oom_score_adj) to work
on a system level, aka "normal" OOM? Is there some peculiarity about
memcg OOM that I'm missing?

Aleksa Sarai
Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH

 \ /
  Last update: 2017-08-15 14:21    [W:0.098 / U:14.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site